Tryptofan jako molekularny mikroprzełącznik: integracja analiz statystycznych BioLiP z symulacjami MD receptorów 5-HT₂

Autor

  • Karina Pakosz Politechnika Krakowska im. Tadeusza Kościuszki w Krakowie, Wydział Inżynierii i Technologii Chemicznej, ul. Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Polska https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3503-6795
  • Paweł Śliwa Politechnika Krakowska im. Tadeusza Kościuszki w Krakowie, Wydział Inżynierii i Technologii Chemicznej, ul. Warszawska 24, 31-155 Kraków, Polska https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9662-8481

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55225/sti.723

Słowa kluczowe:

tryptofan, interakcje białko–ligand, dynamika molekularna

Abstrakt

Tryptophan residues play a critical role in protein-ligand recognition owing to their unique aromatic character, high polarizability, and ability to participate in diverse noncovalent interactions, including π-π stacking, cation-π interactions, hydrogen bonding, and hydrophobic contacts. In this study, a two-stage approach was employed to elucidate the functional significance of tryptophan residues within ligand-binding sites across diverse protein systems. First, a large-scale statistical analysis was performed using a curated dataset of protein-ligand complexes extracted from the BioLiP database. The dataset was analysed with respect to enzymatic classification and Gene Ontology enrichment, revealing a pronounced enrichment of tryptophan residues in the binding sites of hydrolases, oxidoreductases, and transferases, as well as strong associations with metal-ion binding, redox-related functions, and membrane or cytoplasmic localization. Within the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily, rhodopsin-like class A receptors were identified as the most prominently represented group featuring tryptophan-mediated ligand interactions. In the second stage, molecular dynamics simulations were conducted for selected serotonin 5-HT₂ receptor subtypes (5-HT₂A, 5-HT₂B, and 5-HT₂C) to provide atomistic insights into the role of the conserved W6.48 residue. The simulations reveal a stable spatial relationship between the ligand and W6.48, characterized by distances consistent with aromatic anchoring, supporting its role in maintaining ligand orientation and binding pocket organization. Collectively, these results highlight tryptophan as a key determinant of ligand recognition and stabilization across both enzymatic and receptor-mediated systems.

Statystyka pobrań

Statystyki pobrań nie są jeszcze dostępne

Bandyopadhyay A, Sarkar R. Site-selective cleavage of peptides and proteins targeting aromatic amino acid residues. RSC Advances. 2025;15(12):9159–9179. https://doi.org/10.1039/d4ra08956a.   Google Scholar

Barik S. The uniqueness of tryptophan in biology: Properties, metabolism, interactions and localization in proteins. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020;21(22):8776. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21228776.   Google Scholar

Calinsky R, Levy Y. Aromatic residues in proteins: Re-evaluating the geometry and energetics of π-π, cation−π, and CH−π interactions. Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2024;128(36):8687–8700. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c04774.   Google Scholar

Dougherty DA. The cation-π interaction. Accounts of Chemical Research. 2013;46(4):885-893. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar300265y.   Google Scholar

Szczygieł M, Derewenda U, Scheiner S, Minor W, Derewenda ZS. A structural role for tryptophan in proteins, and the ubiquitous TRP Cδ1-H···O=C (backbone) hydrogen bond. Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology. 2024;80(Pt 7):551–562. https://doi.org/10.1107/S2059798324005515.   Google Scholar

Brylinski M. Aromatic interactions at the ligand-protein interface: Implications for the development of docking scoring functions. Chemical Biology and Drug Design. 2018;91(2):380–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/cbdd.13084.   Google Scholar

Shao J, Kuiper BP, Thunnissen AMWH, Cool RH, Zhou L, Huang C, Liu J, et al. The role of tryptophan in π interactions in proteins: An experimental approach. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2022;144(30):13815–   Google Scholar

–13822. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.2c04986.   Google Scholar

Lopez-Balastegui M, Stepniewski TM, Kogut-Günthel MM, Di Pizio A, Rosenkilde MM, Mao J, Selent J. Relevance of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) dynamics for receptor activation, signalling bias and allosteric modulation. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2025;182(14):3211–3224. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.16495.   Google Scholar

Latorraca NR, Venkatakrishnan AJ, Dror RO. GPCR dynamics: Structures in motion. Chemical Reviews. 2017;117(1):139–155. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.   Google Scholar

b00177.   Google Scholar

Trzaskowski B, Latek D, Yuan S, Ghoshdastider U, Debinski A, Filipek S. Action of molecular switches in GPCRs: Theoretical and experimental studies. Current Medicinal Chemistry. 2012;19(8):1090–1109. https://doi.org/10.2174/092986712799320556   Google Scholar

Plazinska A, Plazinski W, Luchowski R, Wnorowski A, Grudzinski W, Gruszecki WI. Ligand-induced action of the W286⁶.⁴⁸ rotamer toggle switch in the β₂-adrenergic receptor. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2017;20(1):581–594. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cp04808d.   Google Scholar

Nichols DE, Nichols CD. Serotonin receptors. Chemical Reviews. 2008;108(5):1614–1641. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr078224o.   Google Scholar

Voitel M, Pankonin M, Vogel A, Leitner K, Kaiser A, Huster D, Hildebran PW, Smith AA. Fine-tuning of the neuropeptide Y1 G protein-coupled receptor by the tryptophan⁶.⁴⁸ “Toggle Switch.” Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2026;148(1):194–205. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5c07143.   Google Scholar

Lee Y, Basith S, Choi S. Recent advances in structure-based drug design targeting class A G protein-coupled receptors utilizing crystal structures and computational simulations. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2018;61(1):1–46. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01453.   Google Scholar

Kim J, Kim J, Choi C, Bae J, Choi HJ. Structural insights into GPCR signalling activated by peptide ligands: From molecular mechanism to therapeutic application. Experimental & Molecular Medicine. 2025;57(7):1467–1481. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-025-01497-y.   Google Scholar

Yuan S, Hu Z, Filipek S, Vogel H. W246⁶.⁴⁸ opens a gate for a continuous intrinsic water pathway during activation of the adenosine A₂A receptor. Angewandte Chemie: International Edition. 2015;54(2):556–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201409679.   Google Scholar

Peng Y, McCorvy JD, Harpsøe K, Lansu K, Yuan S, Popov P, Qu L, Pu M, Che T, Nikolajsen LF, Huang XP, Wu Y, Shen L, Bjørn-Yoshimoto WE, Ding K, Wacker D, Han GW, Cheng J, Katritch V, Jensen AA, Liu ZJ. 5-HT2C receptor structures reveal the structural basis of GPCR polypharmacology. Cell. 2018;72(4):719–730.e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.001.   Google Scholar

Yang J, Roy A, Zhang Y. BioLiP: A semi-manually curated database for biologically relevant ligand-protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Research. 2013;41:D1096-1103. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks966.   Google Scholar

Zhang C, Zhang X, Freddolino PL, Zhang Y. BioLiP2: an updated structure database for biologically relevant ligand-protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Research. 2024.52(D1):D404–412. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad630.   Google Scholar

Lee J, Cheng X, Jo S, MacKerell AD, Klauda JB, Im W. CHARMM-GUI Input Generator for NAMD, Gromacs, Amber, Openmm, and CHARMM/OpenMM simulations using the CHARMM36 Additive Force Field. Biophysical Journal. 2016;110(3 suppl. 1):641a. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2015.11.3431   Google Scholar

Kern NR, Lee J, Choi YK, Im W. CHARMM-GUI Multicomponent Assembler for modeling and simulation of complex multicomponent systems. Nature Communications. 2024;15(1):5459. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49700-4.   Google Scholar

Lee J, Patel DS, Ståhle J, Park S-J, Kern NR, Kim S,Lee J, Cheng X, Valvano MV, Holst O, Knirel Y, Qi Y, Jo S, Klauda JB, Widmalm G, Im W. CHARMM-GUI Membrane Builder for complex biological membrane simulations with glycolipids and lipoglycans. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 2019;15(1):775–786. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01066.   Google Scholar

Pytliak M, Vargová V, Mechírová V, Felšöci M. Serotonin receptors—from molecular biology to clinical applications. Physiological Research. 2011;60(1):15–25. https://doi.org/10.33549/physiolres.931903.   Google Scholar

Manglik A, Kruse AC. Structural basis for G protein-coupled receptor activation. Biochemistry. 2017;56(42):5628––5634. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00747.   Google Scholar

Weis WI, Kobilka BK. The molecular basis of G protein-coupled receptor activation. Annual Review of Biochemistry. 2018;87:897–919. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-033910.   Google Scholar

Pándy-Szekeres G, Munk C, Tsonkov TM, Mordalski S, Harpsøe K, Hauser AS, Bojarski AJ, Gloriam DE. GPCRdb in 2018: Adding GPCR structure models and ligands. Nucleic Acids Research. 2018;46(D1):D440–446. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1109.   Google Scholar

Figure 4: 5-HT2a

Opublikowane

2026-08-17

Jak cytować

Pakosz, K., & Śliwa, P. . (2026). Tryptofan jako molekularny mikroprzełącznik: integracja analiz statystycznych BioLiP z symulacjami MD receptorów 5-HT₂. Science, Technology and Innovation, 25(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.55225/sti.723

Numer

Dział

Artykuły oryginalne