Assessment of the antibacterial activity of chestnut (Castanea sativa) and cloves (Syzygium aromaticum) herbal extracts as an alternative to antibiotics use during post-hatching period of chicks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.8972Słowa kluczowe:
antibiotic resistance, herbal extracts, broiler chicken, mortalityAbstrakt
Bacterial infections of newly hatched chicks are the most common cause of their death in the initial period of rearing. These infections are always treated with antibiotics.
The aim of the study was to investigate the antimicrobial activity of herbal extracts of chestnut (Castanea sativa) and clove (Syzygium aromaticum) against bacterial infections i.e. Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumonice in comparison to antibiotics.
The results of the microbiological analyses showed that the Castanea sativa and Syzygium aromaticum extracts had a slighter antibacterial activity in comparison to antibiotics. The diameter of zone inhibition of the culture’s growth of gram-negative bacteria (i.e. Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae) and gram-positive bacteria (i.e. Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis) was 6–13 mm for these extracts in comparison to 15–30 mm for antibiotics. However, some bacterial strains presented full resistance to the selected antibiotics, e.g., wild strains of Enterobacteriaceae to amoxicillin or Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis to florfenicol, colistin, and doxycycline.
In the second experiment, the effect of the herbal extract mixture added into drinking water on the growth and mortality of chicken broiler during the first rearing week was investigated. There was found that the use of herbal extracts improved the chickens’ body weight (157.4 g; P ≤ 0.008) and decreased mortality rate (2.4%) compared to the control group (144.1 g and 3.9%, respectively) but not to the group treated with antibiotic (161.5 and 0.6% respectively; P ≤ 0.009).
In summary, the use of herbal extracts as a nutritional supplement for poultry seems to have a positive effect on weight gain of young birds, and to some extent reduce mortality in the first week of rearing.
Statystyka pobrań
Bibliografia
Deeming DC, Clyburn V, Williams K, Dixon RA. In ovo microbial contamination of the yolk sac of unhatched broiler and pheasant embryos. Avian Poultry Biology Reviews. 2002;13(4):240–241. Google Scholar
Lister SA, Barrow P. Yolk sac infection. In: Pattison M, McMullin PF, Bradbury JM, Alexander DJ, editors. Poultry disease [= Choroby drobiu]. 6th ed. 2008. 1 st Polish ed. Gajewski M, Łukuć P, translators. Wrocław: Elsevier Urban & Partner. 2011. Google Scholar
Rosario CC, Téllez IG, López CC, Villaseca FJM, Anderson RC, Eslava CC. Bacterial isolation rate from fertile eggs, hatching eggs, and neonatal broilers with yolk sac infection. Revista Latinoamericana de Microbiología. 2004;(46(1-2):12–16. Google Scholar
Ulmer Franco AM, Yolk sac infections in broiler chicks: studies on Escherichia coli, chick acquired immunity and barn microbiology [doctoral dissertation]. Alberta: University of Alberta Edmonton; 2011. doi: https://doi.org/10.7939/R3WH37. Google Scholar
Jahantigh M, Rashki A, Najimi M. A study on bacterial flora and antibacterial resistance of yolk sac infection in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). Comparative Clinical Pathology. 2012;22:645–648. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-012-1459-9. Google Scholar
Nhung NT, Chansiripornchai N, Carrique-Mas JJ. Antimicrobial resistance in bacterial poultry pathogens: a review. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2017;4:126. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00126. Google Scholar
Siwek M, Slawinska A, Stadnicka K, Bogucka J, Dunislawska A, Bednarczyk M. Prebiotics and synbiotics – in ovo delivery for improved lifespan condition in chicken. BMC Veterinary Research. 2018;14(1):402. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-018-1738-z. Google Scholar
Velhner M, Todorović D, Grego E, Cerar Kišek T, Ljubojević D, Cvitković Špik V, Pajić M, Kozoderović G. Characterisation of multidrug resistant Escherichia coli from poultry litter and poultry carrying virulence genes for evaluation of poultry farm management. European Poultry Science. 2020;84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2020.296. Google Scholar
Parks CW, Grimes JL, Ferret PR. Effects of virginiamycin and a mannanoligosaccharide-virginiamycin shuttle program on the growth and performance of large white female turkeys. Poultry Science. 2005;84(12):1967–1973. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/84.12.1967. Google Scholar
Windisch W, Schedle K, Plitzner C, Kroismayr A. Use of phytogenic products as feed additives for swine and poultry. Journal of Animal Science. 2008;86(14 Suppl.):E140–148. doi: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2007-0459. Google Scholar
Quave CL, Lyles JT, Kavanaugh JS, Nelson K, Parlet CP, Crosby HA, Heilmann KP, Horswill AR. Castanea sativa (European chestnut) leaf extracts rich in ursene and oleanene derivatives block Staphylococcus aureus virulence and pathogenesis without detectable resistance. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0136486. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136486. Google Scholar
Adamczak A, Ożarowski M, Karpiński TM. Antibacterial activity of some flavonoids and organic acids widely distributed in plants. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2019;9(1):109. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010109. Google Scholar
De Vasconcelos, MCBM, Bennett RN, Rosa EAS, Ferreira-Cordoso JV. Composition of European chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) and association with health effects: fresh and processed products. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2010;90(10):1578–1589. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4016. Google Scholar
Srivastava S, Chandra D. Pharmacological potentials of Syzygium cumini: a review. Journal of the Science of Foodand Agriculture. 2013;93(9):2084–2093. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6111. Google Scholar
Lupini C, Cecchinato M, Scagliarini A, Graziani R, Catelli E. In vitro antiviral activity of chestnut and quebracho woods extracts against avian reovirus and metapneumovirus. Research in Veterinary Science. 2009;87(3):482–487. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2009.04.007. Google Scholar
Redondo LM, Chacana A, Dominguez JE, Fernandez Miyakawa ME. Perspectives in the use of tannins as alternative to antimicrobial growth promoter factors in poultry. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2014;5:118. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00118. Google Scholar
Semeniuc CA, Pop CR, Rotar AM. Antibacterial activity and interactions of plant essential oil combinations against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. Journal of Food and Drugs Analysis. 2017;25(2):403-408. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2016.06.002. Google Scholar
Kaczmarek B. Tannic acid with antiviral and antibacterial activity as a promising component of biomaterials – a minireview. Materials. 2020;13(14):3224. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13143224. Google Scholar
Štumpf S, Hostnik G, Primožič M, Leitgeb M, Salminen J-P, Bren U. The effect of growth medium strength on minimum inhibitory concentrations of tannins and tannin extracts against E. coli. Molecules. 2020;25(12):2947. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25122947. Google Scholar
Mueller-Harvey I, 2006: Unravelling the conundrum of tannins in animal nutrition and health. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture. 2006;86(13):2010–2037. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2577. Google Scholar
Bole-Hribovsek V, Drobnic-Kosorek M, Ponebsek J, Moran D, Hooge DM. 2012: Minimum inhibitory concentrations of Farmatan® dried all-natural tannic acid (flavoring) feed additive on pathogenic strains of Clostridium perfringens and Escherichia coli plus isolates of four Salmonella species in vitro. Poultry Science Association Annual Meeting. Athens, GA, 2012 July 9–12, P375. Google Scholar
Erfan AM, Marouf S. Cinnamon oil downregulates virulence genes of poultry respiratory bacterial agents and revealed significant bacterial inhibition: an in vitro perspective. Veterinary World. 2019;12(11),1707–1715. doi: https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.1707-1715. Google Scholar
Minieri S, Buccioni A, Serra A, Galigani I, Pezzati A, Rapaccini S, Antongiovanni M. Nutritional characteristics and quality of eggs from laying hens fed on a diet supplemented with chestnut tannin extract (Castanea sativa Miller). British Poultry Science. 2016;57(6):824–833. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2016.1216944. Google Scholar
Schiavone A, Guo K, Tassone S, Gasco L, Hernandez E, Denti R, Zoccarato I. Effects of a natural extract of chestnut wood on digestibility, performance traits, and nitrogen balance of broiler chicks. Poultry Science. 2008;87(3):521–527. doi: https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00113. Google Scholar
Basmacioğlu-Malayoğlu H, Özdemir P, Bağriyanik HA. Influence of an organic acid blend and essential oil blend, individually or in combination, on growth performance, carcass parameters, apparent digestibility, intestinal microflora and intestinal morphology of broilers. British Poultry Science. 2016:57(2):227–234. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2016.1141171. Google Scholar
Hudzicki J. Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion susceptibility test protocol. American Society for Microbiology; 2009. https://www.asmscience.org/content/education/protocol/protocol.3189?crawler=true. Google Scholar
Aviagen. Ross broiler management handbook 2018. Aviagen [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 August 22]. Available from: https://en.aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/Ross_Broiler/Ross-BroilerHandbook2018-EN.pdf. Google Scholar
Nuñez L, D’Aquino M. Microbicide activity of clove essential oil (Eugenia caryophyllata). Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 2012;43(4):1255–1260. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822012000400003. Google Scholar
Hu Q, Zhou M, Wei S. Progress on the antimicrobial activity research of clove oil and eugenol in the food antisepsis field. Journal of Food Science. 2018;83(6):1476–1483. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14180. Google Scholar
Kunicka-Styczyńska A, Tyfa A, Laskowski D, Plucińska A, Rajkowska K, Kowal K. Clove oil (Syzygium aromaticum L.) Activity against Alicyclobacillus acidoterrestris biofilm on technical surfaces. Molecules. 2020;25(15):3334. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25153334. Google Scholar
Ikigai H, Nakae T, Hara Y, Shimamura T. Bactericidal catechins damage the lipid bilayer. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Biomembranes. 1993;1147(1):132–136. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2736(93)90323-R. Google Scholar
Caturla N, Vera-Samper E, Villalaín J, Mateo CR, Micol V. The relationship between the antioxidant and the antibacterial properties of galloylated catechins and the structure of phospholipid model membranes. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. 2003;34(6):648–662. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0891-5849(02)01366-7. Google Scholar
Yang C, Chowdhury MAK, Hou Y, Gong J. Phytogenic compounds as alternatives to in-feed antibiotics: potentials and challenges in application. Pathogens. 2015;4(1):137–156. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens4010137. Google Scholar
Hajati H, Hassanabadi A, Ahmadian F. Application of medicinal plants in poultry nutrition. Journal of Medicinal Plants and By-products. 2014;3(1):1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.22092/jmpb.2014.108597. Google Scholar
Jamroz D, Wiliczkiewicz A, Skorupińska J, Orda J, Kuryszko J, Tschirch H. Effect of sweet chestnut tannin (SCT) on the performance, microbial status of intestine and histological characteristics of intestine wall in chickens. British Poultry Science. 2009;50(6):687–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660903191059. Google Scholar
Redondo, LM, Chacana, PA, Dominguez, JE, Fernandez Miyakawa, MED. Perspectives in the use of tannins as alternative to antimicrobial growth promoter factors in poultry. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2014;5:118. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00118. Google Scholar
Takó M, Kerekes EB, Zambrano C, Kotogán A, Papp T, Krisch J, Vágvölgyi C. Plant phenolics and phenolic-enriched extracts as antimicrobial agents against food-contaminating microorganisms. Antioxidants. 2020;9(2):165. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9020165. Google Scholar
Sharma I, Yaiphathoi S, Hazarika P. Pathogenic Escherichia coli: virulence factors and their antimicrobial resistance. In: Siddhardha B, Dyavaiah M, Syed A, editors. Model organisms for microbial pathogenesis, biofilm formation and antimicrobial drug discovery. Singapore: Springer; 2020. p. 159–173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1695-5_10. Google Scholar
Wallace RJ, Oleszek W, Franz C, Hahn I, Baser KHC, Mathe A, Teichmann K. Dietary plant bioactives for poultry health and productivity. British Poultry Science. 2010;51(4):461–487. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2010.506908. Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Jak cytować
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2020 Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa w Tarnowie & Autorzy
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne 4.0 Międzynarodowe.