Restriction on human exposure to xenobiotics: theory and practice

Authors

  • Krzysztof L. Krzystyniak Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Québec, Kanada
  • Mieczysław Obiedziński Lomza State University of Applied Sciences, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2259-4044
  • Hanna Kalota City Clinic, Warsaw, Poland
  • Andrzej Marszałek Synevo Poland, Warsaw, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.7722

Keywords:

xenobiotics, human biomonitoring (HBM), chemical biomarkers, endocrine disruptor chemicals (EDCs), genotoxic carcinogens

Abstract

Exposure to environmental xenobiotics, which influence the everyday life of all humans in our times, has become a subject of intensive analysis by scientists, authorities of environmental hazards, state authorities and authors of legislation. Toxicological risk assessment of chemicals in contaminated food and water as well as polluted air is expressed in basic ‘toxic units’. A broad-scale human biomonitoring (HBM) for environmental toxicants is the strategy of a cause-effect analysis of chemical exposure to environmental xenobiotics. HBM demonstrates the relationships between exposure to xenobiotics and the following health disorders: obesity, impaired reproduction, type 1 diabetes (T1D), autism, cancers and other diseases in the society. Developing effective toxicological tools and legislative standards is expected to help in eliminating endocrine disruptor chemicals (EDCs), which cause infertility. The exceptional category of xenobiotics, which highly influences human health, and is treated as a priority problem to be controlled in the European Union, form genotoxic carcinogens. According to a current assessment, hundreds of chemical xenobiotics and their metabolites, in the minimum detectable quantity, mostly all of anthropogenic origin, can be found in the organisms of inhabitants in western countries. Despite the permanent presence of xenobiotics in human environment, it is worth taking into consideration practical methods to limit and avoid contacts with environmental chemicals. It concerns the provision of water and air filters, the thermal processing of food, the selection of food products, and other aspects of everyday life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Kumar A., Xagorakaki I. Pharmaceuticals, personal care products andendocrine-disruptiung chemicals in US surface and finished drinking waters: A proposed ranking system. Sci Total Environ, 2010, 408, 5972-5989.   Google Scholar

Plotan M., Frizzel C., Robinson V. i wsp. Endocrine disruptor activity in mineral and flavoured water. Food Chem, 2013, 136, 1590-1596.   Google Scholar

Wang H., Wang N., Wang B. i wsp. Antibiotics detected in urines and adipogenesis in school children. Environ Int, 2016, 89-90, 204-211.   Google Scholar

Sarigiannis D.A., Karakitsios S.P.,Handakas E. i wsp. Intergated risk characterizati on of bisphenol-A in Europe. Food Chem Toxicol, 2016, 98, 134-147.   Google Scholar

Katsikantami I., Sifakis S., TzatzarakisM.N., Vakonaki E. i wsp. A globalassessment of phthalates burdenand related links to health effects. Environ. Int, 2016, 97, 201-236.   Google Scholar

Fromme H., Albrecht M., Appel M.i wsp. PCBs, PCDD/Fs, and PBDEsin blood samples of a rural populationin South Germany. Int J Hyg Environ Health, 2015, 218, 41-46.   Google Scholar

Alves A. Are nails a valuable non--invasive alternative for estimatinghuman exposure to phthalate esters? Environ Res, 2016, 151, 184-194.   Google Scholar

Hutter H.P., Kundi M., Hohenblum P. i wsp. Life without plastic: A family experiment and biomonitoring study. Environ. Res, 2016, 150, 639-644.   Google Scholar

Alvez A., Kucharska A., ErraticoC. i wsp. Human biomonitoring of emerging pollutants through non-invasivematrices: state of the art and future potential. Anal Bioanal Chem, 2014, 406, 4063-4088.   Google Scholar

Dereumeaux C., Saudi A., Pecheux M. i wsp. Biomarkers of exposure to environmental contaminants in French pregnant women from Elfecohort in 2011. Environ Int, 2016, 97, 56-67.   Google Scholar

Papastergiadis A., Fatouch A., Jacxsens L. i wsp. Exposure assessment of malondialdehyde, 4-hydroxy-2(E)-nonenal and 4-hydroxy-2(E)-hexenal through specific foods available in Belgium. Food Chem Toxico, 2014, 73, 51-58.   Google Scholar

Singhal S.S., Singh S.P., Singhal P. i wsp. Antioxidant role of glutathione S-transferases: 4-Hydroxynonenal, a key molecule in stress-mediated signaling. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 2015, 298, 361-370.   Google Scholar

Halliwell B., Aeschbach R., Loliger J. i wsp. The characterisation of antioxidants. Food Chem Toxicol, 1995, 33, 601-617.   Google Scholar

Engel E., Ratel J., Bouhlel J. i wsp. Novel approaches to improving the chemical safety of the meat chain towards toxicants. Meat Sci, 2015, 109, 75-85.   Google Scholar

Sachse B., Meinl W., Sommer Y. i wsp. Bioactivation of food genotoxicants5 hydroxymethylfurfural and furfuryl alcohol by sulfotransferases from human, mouse and rat: a comparative study. Arch Toxicol, 2016, 90, 137-148.   Google Scholar

Chevallier C., Batisse A., Marillier M. i wsp. E-cigarettes and tobacco cessation: An online survey of electronic cigarette users in France. 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.01.998   Google Scholar

Burstyn I. Peering through the mist: systematic review of what the chemistry of contaminants in electronic cigarettes tells us about health risks. BMC Public Health, 2014, 14, 18-32.   Google Scholar

Published

2017-06-30

How to Cite

Krzystyniak, K., Obiedziński, M., Kalota, H. ., & Marszałek, A. (2017). Restriction on human exposure to xenobiotics: theory and practice. Health Promotion & Physical Activity, 2(3), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0010.7722